Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
P
purr-data
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 268
    • Issues 268
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 16
    • Merge Requests 16
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • Jonathan Wilkes
  • purr-data
  • Issues
  • #698

Closed
Open
Opened Jan 09, 2021 by Alexandre Porres@porres

fluid~ prog message changed

hi, original code has prog messages indexed from 0, which I think is the correct way, see https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/svn/HEAD/tree/trunk/externals/footils/fluid/fluid/main.cpp#l193 Purr Data's version changed this, breaking backwards compatibility, by indexing it from 1, see https://git.purrdata.net/jwilkes/purr-data/-/blob/master/externals/fluid~/fluid~.c#L93

I see there's a new program method in smmf mode that also indexes from 1 and that also doesn't seem correct to me, but at least it's not breaking any backwards compatibility.

cheers

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: jwilkes/purr-data#698