array name should be inside the array to provide a more predictable bbox calculation and keep consistency with 1.0 branch

Keeping it where it is now limits array's utility for visualization purposes--its bbox detection is not accurate (at least not in vanilla) as it does not factor in the label. Perhaps this should be one of the additions to the -legacy flag to support both vanilla and new behavior, even though outside the bbox inconsistency it should not have any major impact on the compatibility/operability. Long-term-wise this may be also something that can be repositioned?